Credit: Kekeli K. Blamey
Prof. Stephen Adei, a renowned educationist has commended President John Mahama for what he describes as a strong performance during the president’s initial 120 days in office.
Speaking ahead of President Mahama’s scheduled address on the milestones achieved during his 120-day social contract with Ghanaians, Prof. Adei noted that, from an objective standpoint, the president has made impressive strides.
“I congratulate John on his 120 days. Anyone who is being objective would acknowledge that he has done very well,” Prof. Adei said.
“We hope he can sustain the momentum, address any shortcomings, and work toward delivering the Ghana we all desire.”
President Mahama is expected to use the upcoming address to highlight his accomplishments and lay out future plans, reinforcing his commitment to transparent governance and public engagement.
However, Prof. Adei also urged caution in heaping too much praise on the president so early in his term, pointing to past disappointments.
“We must be careful not to overpraise John just based on 120 days,” he warned. “In Akufo-Addo’s first term, expectations were high after a strong start, but many were later disappointed, especially with the performance of his second term.”
Brief background
President John Dramani Mahama has introduced a comprehensive 2025 Code of Conduct aimed at enhancing integrity, transparency, and accountability among ministers and political appointees.
The 66-page policy document, accessed by AnC Empire Multimedia, outlines firm ethical guidelines to combat corruption, prevent conflicts of interest, and curtail abuse of power within government.
However , here are ten key highlights from the Code:
- Zero Tolerance for Corruption and Conflicts of Interest
Ministers must avoid situations where personal interests may compromise their public duties. They are expressly forbidden from owning businesses that engage in government contracts or profiting from insider information. In cases of significant conflict, divestment or resignation may be required. - Mandatory Asset Declaration
In line with Article 286 of the 1992 Constitution, all ministers are obligated to declare their assets—including land, businesses, and valuables exceeding GHC5 million—before assuming office, every four years, and upon leaving office. Non-compliance constitutes a legal violation. - Ban on Acquisition of State Assets
Ministers are barred from purchasing government-owned property, whether directly or through intermediaries. Any breach of this rule results in immediate dismissal. - Regulated Gifts and Hampers
All gifts valued above GHC20,000 must be declared to the Cabinet. The use of public funds for hampers is strictly limited and requires prior approval from the Chief of Staff for staff-related occasions. - Standards for Public and Social Media Conduct
Appointees are expected to maintain decorum in public discourse, avoid inflammatory language, and respect state institutions. Public criticism of the judiciary or other agencies may result in disciplinary action. - Confidentiality of Cabinet Materials
The unauthorized disclosure of Cabinet documents is grounds for dismissal. Materials labeled “Secret” must be securely stored, with printed drafts shredded after use. Digital copies must be equally protected. - Transparent Travel and Sponsorship
Ministers must obtain advance approval from the Chief of Staff for international travel. Third-party sponsorships must be fully disclosed, and retroactive approvals are strictly prohibited. - Ban on Influence Peddling
Using one’s position to secure benefits for family or friends is strictly forbidden. Ministers must recuse themselves from decisions involving individuals with whom they have personal ties. - Upholding Cabinet Solidarity
Ministers are required to publicly support all Cabinet decisions. While internal dissent is permitted, public opposition may lead to dismissal. - Workplace Ethics and Anti-Harassment Measures
Ministers must foster a respectful and safe working environment, address any form of harassment promptly, and avoid nepotistic appointments within their offices.
